 |
March 2008 Health in the News Archive
Cell phones more dangerous than smoking
March 2008
Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.
The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, draws on growing evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.
"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana. His assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year.
Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimize handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.
Professor Khurana a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
A mobile-phone industry group dismissed Khurana's claims as exaggerated and pointed out that health groups say cell phones are safe. The American Cancer Society also says there is no link.
But consider this: It took until the 1960's for people to accept the idea that cigarette smoke was harmful. It was another 20 to 30 years before secondhand smoke was accepted as dangerous and outlawed in the work place. Cigarette proponents for decades offered that health claims were exaggerated, that "It's not for sure," and "It needs more study."
Resveratrol and pancreatic cancer helpful antioxidant
March 2008
Resveratrol, an antioxidant found in red-purple grape skins and red wine, "destroyed pancreatic cancer cells," according to a study published in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.
Paul Okunieff, M.D., chief of radiation oncology at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York, and colleagues, examined the effects of a 50 microgram/milliliter dose of resveratrol on pancreatic cancer cells alone, and in combination with radiation treatment. Researchers found that "resveratrol seems to have a therapeutic gain by making tumor cells more sensitive to radiation and making normal tissue less sensitive." Moreover, resveratrol "injured the cancer cell's energy source, and decreased its potential to function." The authors concluded, "While additional studies are needed, this research indicates that resveratrol has a promising future as part of the treatment for cancer."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
It is good to see appearing in mainstream literature what has been common knowledge in functional medicine circles for years. Yes, anti-oxidants are very helpful to treat all forms of oxidative stress, including cancer. Resveratrol is one of the polyphenol antioxidants abundant in grapes, berries, tea, red cabbage, eggplant, beans, whole grains, and cocoa. It is most abundant in blue, red, and purple grapes. Resveratrol is also abundant in a Chinese medicinal root called hu zhang (Polygonum cuspidatum), which is often the source of resveratrol in dietary supplements.
Resveratrol is produced by the grape plant to protect it against environmental stress. How fitting that it will also help to protect us against environmental stress because what is cancer, if not the ultimate result of environmental stress? And when we eat the grapes, we derive the same benefit as the plant this is called xenohormesis messages through our food from other species. How much better to eat these helpful messages, rather than the terrified hormonal messages from the modern meat slaughterhouses.
WalMart goes rBGH free cleaner milk
March 2008
WalMart announced its store brand of milk, which is labeled "Great Value," will no longer come from cows injected with Monsanto's controversial genetically engineered hormone, rBGH/rBST.
rBGH is banned in Europe, Canada, and most of the industrialized world.
WalMart said its change was prompted by consumer demands. "Many WalMart customers have expressed a desire for milk choices," the company said in a news release.
Organic Consumer Union's Director, Ronnie Cummins, stated in an interview with the Toronto Globe and Mail, Wal-Mart's announcement will likely serve as a tipping point for driving Monsanto's controversial bovine drug off the market. The group has campaigned aggressively against rBGH. According to Cummins, "After 14 years of bullying consumers and buying off FDA and USDA bureaucrats, this is the beginning of the end for this dangerous drug."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
rBGH is sold as Posilac. Monsanto has been forced to admit to about 20 toxic effects, including mastitis, on its Posilac label. Mastitis causes increased amounts of pus in milk. The use of it increases the amount of milk cows give.
According to Dr. Samuel Epstein, rBGH milk is supercharged with high levels of a natural growth factor (IGF-1), which is readily absorbed through the gut. Excess levels of IGF-1 have been incriminated as a cause of breast, colon, and prostate cancers; IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms against early submicroscopic cancers.
WalMart's move sends a powerful signal to food manufacturers about the growing mainstream demand for food that is free of hormones and other man-made contaminants. Educated consumers have the power to move mountains.
Dennis Quaid's twins drug ordeal hospital mistakes
March 2008
Actor Dennis Quaid and his wife, Kimberly, were featured on the news program 60 Minutes as they kicked off a new campaign to bring national attention to hospital errors.
When the Quaid's newborn twins showed signs of a having a staph infection last November, they were admitted to Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles for treatment. A hospital mistake resulted in two massive overdoses of a blood thinner that caused the babies to nearly bleed to death.
The same type of avoidable mistake was made a year earlier in an Indiana hospital. In that case, six infants were given multiple adults doses of heparin instead of the pediatric version. Three of the six infants died.
"The mistakes that occurred to us were not unique," Quaid said. Preventable human medical error is one of the leading causes of death in America. "It's bigger than AIDS. It's bigger than breast cancer. It's bigger than automobile accidents. And, yet, no one seems to be really be aware of the problem," he says.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
In 2000 the Institute of Medicine (medical arm of the National Academy of Science) published the results of a long term study on medical errors titled "To Err is Human".
Among its findings-
Every single year in the US direct medical errors result in:
- at least 100,000 deaths (half medication error, half surgical error)
- 116 million extra doctors visits
- 77 million extra prescriptions
- 17 million extra emergency room visits
- 8 million extra hospitalizations
Another 225,000 deaths occur from preventable adverse events such as hospital borne infections.
It is estimated that only 5 to 20 percent of adverse reactions and medical mistakes are ever reported.
The "To Err is Human" report concluded that if put in their own category, medical errors would be the 5th leading cause of death in the US killing more people than stroke, Alzheimer's, most forms of cancer, and car accidents.
According to Dr. Carolyn Dean, author of Death by Modern Medicine in 2005, the mainstream medical industry kills 784,000 people each year in America; "Saddam Hussein did not kill that many people each year," she wrote.
Genes factor into post-traumatic stress disorder child abuse key
March 2008
According to a study published in the March 19th issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, "people abused as children, who have variations of a gene related to stress, may be at higher risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) later."
Elizabeth B. Binder, M.D., Ph.D., of Emory University in Atlanta, Ga., and colleagues, recruited 900 participants from the general medical and obstetrics/gynecology clinics of a public hospital. The patients "reported a history of child-abuse trauma or trauma from other causes on a survey," and they all "had single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping."
The researchers analyzed eight FKBP5 polymorphisms, and found no significant effect on the total PSS [PTSD Symptom Scale] score, and no significant interaction with exposure to nonchild abuse trauma. But, analysis identified four SNPs [single nucleotide polymorphisms] that showed significant interactions with childhood abuse. Moreover, "SNPs associated with the highest induction of FKBP5 expression were associated with increased risk of adult PTSD symptoms, and greater GR [glucocorticoid receptor] sensitivity."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Lots of genetic variants can certainly explain in part why some people get a disease and others don't, with exactly the same predisposing factors. However, it is important to realize that there still has to be a "provoking incident" in order for the genetic variant to result in an actual expression of disease. This is called an "epigenetic" factor, something which happens to the person with the genetic variant. So
genetic variants exist. They do not result in disease unless the epigenetic factors are sufficient to overwhelm the system. Thus, post traumatic stress disorder does not occur in the absence of a significant traumatic stress. Heart disease and osteoporosis do not occur in the absence of a diet and lifestyle predisposing to chronic inflammation. We can't change our genetic variants, but we certainly have a great deal of influence over their expression.
Not all diabetes is the same there are genetic subtypes
March 2008
The Associated Press reports, "Diabetes is undergoing a genetics revolution that suggests there actually are many subtypes of the disease." A set of subtypes is called MODY, which is "shorthand for six different subtypes thought to account for two percent of all diabetes." In addition, each is caused by a single, different gene. Diabetes specialists typically suspect MODY "when patients are extra hard to treat, especially skinny people diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, or young adults with diabetic relatives who abruptly seem to develop Type 1."
Andrew Hattersley, M.D., a British physician-scientist, has pioneered how to treat single-gene subtypes. For instance, Dr. Hattersley has found that old diabetes drugs called sulfonylureas neutralize a gene called HNF1-alpha so insulim production resumes. To date, researchers have discovered 16 genes that "play a role in Type 2 diabetes, and at least 14 in Type 1." MODY may explain at least partially why diabetes strikes one person who's overweight, but not another who's equally heavy, or why one diabetic needs dialysis, while another has healthy kidneys despite decades of bad blood sugar.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
So maybe those people who respond poorly to a low glycemic diet would respond better if they were simultaneously taking something to increase their insulin sensitivity like the hops rho alpha iso acids pioneered by the Metagenics company, or even like metformin, pioneered by the pharmaceutical industry. It is helpful to know the genotype, in order to be able to treat the individual in the most appropriate and economic way.
'Natural' personal care products contain carcinogens misleading
March 2008
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) reports a toxic chemical linked to cancer is found in more than 40 percent products that call themselves "natural".
OCA analyzed leading "natural" and "organic" brand shampoos, body washes, lotions and other personal care products for the presence of the undisclosed carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane, a petroleum compound.
OCA reports, "Ethoxylation, a cheap short-cut companies use to provide mildness to harsh ingredients, requires the use of the cancer-causing petrochemical Ethylene Oxide, which generates 1,4-Dioxane as a by-product. 1,4-Dioxane is considered a chemical 'known to the State of California to cause cancer' under proposition 65, and has no place in 'natural' or 'organic' branded personal care products. 1,4-dioxane is also suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant, and is a leading groundwater contaminant."
Some of the leading brands which were found to contain 1,4-dioxane included Jason Pure and Natural Organic, Giovanni Organic Cosmetics, Kiss My Face, and Nature's Gate Organics.
Dr. Grout's Comments:
When reading labels on personal products and makeup, you can avoid ingredients with "myreth," "oleth," "laureth," "ceteareth," any other "eth," "PEG," "polyethylene," "polyethylene glycol," "polyoxyethylene," or "oxynol," in the names.
Consumer beware. Your best bet is to purchase products whose ingredients you can pronounce or are certified under the USDA National Organic Program.
Brazilian protesters destroy GM crops sending a message
March 2008
Approximately 300 women in Brazil burst into a property owned by the US company Monsanto and destroyed a plant nursery and crops containing genetically modified corn.The women were protesting what they saw as environmental damage by the crops.
The Brazilian government had "caved in to pressure from agrobusinesses" by recently allowing tinkered crops to be grown in the country, said Igor Foride, a member of the Landless Workers' Movement.
In Brasilia, a protest by another 400 women from an umbrella group, Via Campesina (the Rural Way), was held in front of the Swiss embassy against Syngenta, a Swiss company that is selling genetically modified seeds in Brazil.
Via Campesina said in a statement that "no scientific studies exist that guarantee that genetically modified crops won't have negative effects on human health and on nature."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Violence is a tough way to make a point, but their point is valid. There are no studies that show GM foods are safe, but there are studies that raise serious doubts.
Exposure to diacetyl fumes may cause lung damage - "popcorn lung"
March 2008
According to a study published online in Toxicology Sciences, a "chemical used to give butter flavor to popcorn can damage the lungs and airways of mice." Scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences studied the effects of diacetyl, a component of artificial butter flavoring on mice.
Daniel Morgan, Ph.D., and colleagues, found that the mice developed lung damage when exposed to levels of diacetyl fumes found in flavoring factories. Other studies have linked diacetyl fumes to a rare, life-threatening lung disease called bronchiolitis obliterans [or popcorn lung] in workers in the flavor industry. The disease makes it difficult for air to flow out of the lungs.
Currently, the FDA classifies diacetyl as being 'generally recognized as safe,' but consumer advocates have petitioned the agency to reconsider "diacetyl's safety status.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
This study speaks for itself. We keep coming back to the same old statement, if we can't pronounce it, and it has to be made in a laboratory, we probably should not eat it (or breathe it).
CDC withdraws preference for combination MMRV increased seizures
March 2008
U.S. health officials are no longer recommending the combination MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella) vaccine over the MMR vaccine in combination with a separate varicella vaccine. According to a report published in the Mar. 14 issue of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the move comes after new data showed that the MMRV shot increased the risk for febrile seizures - convulsions brought on by fever - in children aged 12 to 23 months. Another reason for the change is the fact that due to "manufacturing difficulties, the MMRV shot, made by Merck, won't really be available until about this time next year."
The changes have nothing to do with a possible vaccination link to autism," said Dr. Robert Frenck, a professor of pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
At least this delay gives us time to inform our parents that the vaccination schedule, as it is currently established, is unsafe and needs to be significantly modified in order to be safe for those of our children who have difficulty with detoxification. And is it possible that the recorded drop in IQ scores over the past 10 years may reflect the difficulty of ALL our children with these injections of toxic and infectious compounds? We have an entire lost generation, those children who received vaccinations between 1990 and 2002, who are at risk for developmental and immune system dysfunction for the rest of their lives. If we learn from the events, then we can do something to help future generations of children. It is up to us, one child at a time.
Pharmaceuticals found in drinking water what affect on humans?
March 2008
An Associated Press investigation found that a vast array of pharmaceuticals - including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones - have been found in the drinking water supplies of 24 major metropolitan areas, from Southern California to Northern New Jersey.
The concentrations of these pharmaceuticals are tiny, measured in quantities of parts per billion or trillion, far below the levels of a medical dose. Utilities insist their water is safe.
Drugs enter the water supply when unused amounts of drugs are excreted into the toilet. And drugs from commercial livestock and pets also enter the water supply after excretion.
While researchers do not yet understand the exact risks from decades of persistent exposure to random combinations of low levels of pharmaceuticals, recent studies have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife.
"We recognize it is a growing concern and we're taking it very seriously," said Benjamin H. Grumbles, assistant administrator for water at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The AP's investigation also indicates that watersheds, the natural sources of most of the nation's water supply, also are contaminated. Pharmaceuticals also permeate aquifers deep underground, source of 40 percent of the nation's water supply.
Even users of bottled water and home filtration systems don't necessarily avoid exposure. Bottlers, some of which simply repackage tap water, do not typically treat or test for pharmaceuticals, according to the industry's main trade group. The same goes for the makers of home filtration systems.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Phoenix's water was not tested as part of this AP investigation. According to the Arizona Republic edition of 03-14-08, both Phoenix and Scottsdale plan to initial testing of their drinking water for pharmaceutical medications. Other cities in the area are choosing to wait and see if the Federal Government tells us that the levels of pharmaceuticals are dangerous. I must confess that I am VERY glad I live in one of the cities which is choosing to be proactive about this potentially extremely dangerous issue.
Recent laboratory research has found that small amounts of medication have affected human embryonic kidney cells, human blood cells and human breast cancer cells. The cancer cells proliferated too quickly; the kidney cells grew too slowly; and the blood cells showed biological activity associated with inflammation.
The federal government doesn't require any testing and hasn't set safety limits for drugs in water. Given the power and influence of the pharmaceutical industry, safety limits if there are such things could be a long time coming. |

|
|
 |